Work- anywhere, any time, anyplace
In the war for talent, enabling the emerging “technology-savvy” team to work anywhere, any time and any place has become paramount in corporate weaponry. Networked, distributed workplace strategies integrating physical workplace solutions with technology connectivity are the key to the future success for new millennia corporations such as Sun Microsystems, Nortel and Cisco. However, the more traditional corporations and government agencies need to pay attention if they wish to compete in this war for talent.
These convergent workplaces, which maximise the benefits and synergies of physical space and technology connectivity, are creating new challenges for the CRE executive in having to engage more closely with the HR and IT support groups within organisations. With physical workplace, technologies and even human resources being able to be substituted for each other, the corporate responsibilities between the groups that have traditionally managed these resources are becoming less clear and meaningless.
The corporate challenges in managing the workforce in enabled distributed workplaces were considered by Jeffrey Huang in his Harvard Business Review paper entitled Future Space – A New Blueprint for Business Architecture, published in April 2001. It is well worth re-visiting these considerations as new challenges arise for the CRE executive in designing workplace options for the future.
Matching workplace form to function
In a physical design sense, matching form to function is fundamentally related to designing buildings with external built forms that reflect the functions being carried out within the structure. With connected workspace, matching form to function takes on a broader meaning.
The workplace form relates more to how the function and activity itself is to be performed. Are the activities to be delivered in physical workplaces, virtual workspaces or a combination of the two? And how are the human resources to be deployed – via employment and other contracts or outsourcing arrangements?
The design of integrated physical and virtual workspaces should not think of customers and employees’ physical and on-line functions separately, but rather holistically within a single structure. Specific functions need to be broken down into component activities and these allocated between physical and technologically linked workspace. This will ultimately dictate the form of the physical workplace, the technological support and the contractual form of the required workforce support.
Visualising the presence of others in various workplaces
After plotting the connections of the different operating activities between those performed physically and virtually, the next challenge is connecting the people in these fundamentally different workspaces.
In a physical corporate world, we generally know who is in the workplace and available for interaction. In a mixed virtual and physical world, the challenge is to know which part of the team is “at work”, either physically present or logged-on remotely. Obviously flexible working and contractual arrangements exacerbate the problem.
New approaches to managing the teams will, by necessity, begin to evolve. On a virtual basis, team members can easily “hide” or be virtually present while sitting on the beach. New management controls and motivation processes will need to evolve to ensure productivity is maintained and enhanced.
These will be supported by emerging protocols designed to ensure that all are aware of the presence of others in the workplace – whatever form that may take – so that corporate interactions are facilitated. Daily “clocking in”, albeit virtually, may soon become a reality once again. Digital workspace registers either via PC screens or large electronic display screens, indicating presence may become ubiquitous in the corporate environment for all to scrutinise.
Personalising workspaces to individual preferences
The new top performers in the workforce will want to personalise their workplaces, both physical and virtual, to suit their preferences and team requirements. Although customising virtual workspaces is generally more flexible and cost-effective than physical workplaces, team members will also expect the flexibility in their physical workplaces. Instant personalisation of physical workspaces to meet the needs of the current workforce priorities will become a necessity.
The ability to meet the requirements of the continually changing activities that form part of the typical day of digital age workers is part of the challenge. Daily activities may include trading, advising, negotiating, controlling, creating, communicating, managing, learning and researching, with or without interacting with others, either physically or virtually present, in small or large groups. These activities all need to be accommodated instantly.
Designers and suppliers are responding to these challenges with the next generation of workspace components. Innovative design solutions are likely to be the key to cost-effective flexibility. However “self churn” and constant changing floors are challenges that traditional facility managers and CRE executives may find daunting.
Choreographing connectivity between workers
The most complex challenge in creating convergent workspaces is designing the appropriate interface between team members in the physical and virtual worlds. The information technology and communication industry is evolving rapidly and enabling interfacing on a more seamless basis with new devices, both mobile and fixed. These connectivity devices are emerging continually and in the future may include walls, ceilings, floor, mobile phones, screens, computers, cars, PDAs, MP3s, etc.
A critical success element of this connectivity is ensuring that content is tailored to match context. This will require selecting the right places for interfaces; choosing the right input and output devices; and ensuring the right content is delivered at the right time and in the right form. New management and corporate governance issues are plentiful.
Within the new workplace, spread across virtual and physical locations, choreographing of contact will need to replace much of the informal contact of the past. Much of the team spirit of an organisation is based on informal interactions. Team members drinking coffee in break-out areas is often the source of the most innovative ideas. Corporate loyalty has traditionally been based on regular physical presence, which will now occur less frequently. In a mixed virtual and physical environment, these interactions may have to be choreographed. But can management meet this new leadership challenge and will the contrived choreographed contact prove effective?
Response to this challenge for the CRE executive and workplace managers starts by engaging with the business units in the organisation to understand their future unarticulated needs. But this needs to be supported by also engaging with all the other corporate support groups, including IT, HR and finance to provide the optimum enabled workplace platforms for the business units. This will require that traditional corporate support responsibility barriers be removed and corporate support in whatever form is delivered on an integrated basis
